deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
  • Photo
  • Art Gifts
Download Image
JPG, 1024×683
more ▶

More from *Iulian-dA-gallery

Featured in Groups:

Details

October 7, 2012
721 KB
1024×683
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 17
Favourites: 135 [who?]

Views: 588 (1 today)
Downloads: 28 (0 today)

Camera Data

NIKON CORPORATION
NIKON D3100
10/1000 second
F/8.0
165 mm
400
Sep 16, 2012, 1:01:08 PM
Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows
[x]
Add a Comment:
 
:icondeanreevesii:
I wrestled with the decision to critique this image. I cast the deciding vote to decline this submission. I saw you were asking for critique, and if you're serious about improving then I can't help but to explain why you were declined.

Floral shots are super common. That, in and of itself is unavoidable, and shouldn't stop you from shooting flowers. However it must push you to shoot a unique image.

A straight-down shot of a flower is the least creative angle you can shoot a flower from.

A dew covered rose is common enough to be cliche.

Your composition, having the rose smack-dab in the middle of the shot, is about the worst possible composition you can have. Having your subject dead-center of the frame makes the image look like a snap-shot no matter how well you post-process it.

Finally, post processing. You appear to be pretty proficient in your post skills, and that's great. Your background is cooled to help the rose pop, and that's nice. Also the contrast between the sharpness of your subject and background is good. The clarity of the droplets is crisp and defined, which they should be for this type of shot. The only thing I would suggest as far as technique goes is to possibly use a lighter touch. Your rose almost looks like it's part of a different image that's been pasted in, and separating the foreground and background a little less could help unify the elements.

For example, when I'm processing often I will adjust something to where I think it looks cool and then drop the opacity of that adjustment or layer to 50-75%. What looks good to me after a few hours staring at Photoshop will often look pretty extreme to someone seeing the image for the first time.

All in all I think you're a good photographer, and you have some good technical skills under your belt. You should really focus on learning composition and creativity. Shoot it like this until you have your camera tuned to exactly how you want it set for the subject then shoot another hundred or more pictures from all different angles and focal lengths. Experiment experiment experiment.

While I'm more of a insect than floral shooter I can tell you, my best shots all involved rolling around on the ground, getting a bit dirty, and looking at the world from a different angle. A different point of view is what makes an image compelling, that's what will make someone look twice.

Anyway, keep up the good work!!!
What do you think?
The Artist thought this was FAIR
5 out of 5 deviants thought this was fair.

The Artist has requested Critique on this Artwork

Please sign up or login to post a critique.

love 3 3 joy 0 0 wow 1 1 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconrobin-angelinne:
Beautiful! Flowers shots probably are common, but this is so beautiful...
Reply
:iconnizamani:
~nizamani Oct 8, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
wow lovely
Reply
:iconiulian-da-gallery:
*Iulian-dA-gallery Oct 8, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
I'm glad you like it. Thanks.:D
Reply
:iconkokinomala:
so beautiful!:heart:
Reply
:iconiulian-da-gallery:
*Iulian-dA-gallery Oct 8, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Thank you.:)
Reply
:iconkokinomala:
you are welcome:hug:
Reply
:iconzayoon:
~Zayoon Oct 7, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
So Beautiful =')
Reply
:iconiulian-da-gallery:
*Iulian-dA-gallery Oct 8, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Thank you.:aww:
Reply
:iconregiavulpes:
~RegiaVulpes Oct 7, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I love the picture:). Maybe because I love roses but this is really amazing :love:!
Reply
:iconiulian-da-gallery:
*Iulian-dA-gallery Oct 8, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Thanks.:D
Reply
Add a Comment: